PRESIDENT RAMAPHOSA – no tax money was involved in CR17 funding

The president while answering questions yesterday at the plenary, national assembly explained that his CR17 campaigned did not make use of taxpayers. The CR17 funding had generated controversies after public protector submitted her reports to the court and the leak that came there after.

During the Parliament session yesterday, President Ramaphosa has hit back at his detractors, saying individuals involved in his CR17 presidential campaign owe no one an apology for raising funds. While responding to revelations of how high-profile individuals who had allegedly received handsome payouts following his campaign ahead of the ANC elective conference in 2017, He said “If there are members of the executive, they did (this fundraising) as individual party members and were exercising their democratic and constitutional rights. They owe no apology for what they did.”

In a bid to ask the president a question, EFF leader Julius Malema, quizzed Ramaphosa on the ministers and staff in the Presidency involved in fundraising as well as potential funders the president allegedly met. Ramaphosa in his reply  insisted that all those who contributed to CR17, including donors and himself, did so out of “concern for the future of the country”. He pointed out that if there was any evidence of wrongdoing in the CR17 campaign against the country’s laws, he would be willing to act without any doubt.

ANC’s MP Tandi Mahambehlala asked the president “Was there any taxpayers’ money (used)? The president responded that “Was there any taxpayers’ money (used)? There was no taxpayers’ (money) utilised in the CR17 campaign. I can state it that if it is found to be so, we will take action.”

Ramaphosa noted that since the release of Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane’s report last month into the R500 000 donation from Bosasa, there was suddenly wide interest in the funding and operations of his campaign and that others used leaked information for sinister agendas. He said “As I indicated already, the public protector report is under judicial review. Our independent courts will make a determination in this regard.”

The president however noted that the report had sparked a debate on the issue of political funding which he said was needed in the country, adding he has since initiated a discussion within the ANC, which currently has no rules and regulations of disclosure of funding of internal leadership contests. He said “It is a matter to be discussed by courts and the declaration needed to be made for internal party campaigning. Once (the) courts have declared, we will be able to take that forward.”

According to Ramaphosa, the current Political Party Funding Act does not regulate the private and public funding of parties and their disclosure. “This is the appropriate time to consider whether it is necessary for funding of internal contest to be disclosed and regulated,” Ramaphosa said before challenging the National Assembly to come up with a solution. He also told members of the parliament that “I’m sure you would agree it would be unreasonable and potentially prejudicial to expect disclosure of such information until all candidates and parties are held to the same requirements of disclosure.”

The EFF leader however reminded Ramaphosa that he should be held to account. He said  “Why do you have a problem in disclosing the names of people who made donations to you even if you did so for internal party contest? The sooner you come to reality the better; You are the president and should be held to high standards.”

In a responce to the EFF leader, Ramaphosa told Malema he agreed that transparency was an absolute necessity and that he did not have a problem with that. Ramaphosa also agreed with UDM leader Bantu Holomisa that the litigation between him and Mkhwebane did not augur well for democracy. He said “It so happens that the findings of the public protector were found challenge-able in law and in fact. My advice has been (that) we should go to an arbiter like a court. We should not be alarmed when things like this happen.”

A confident and seemingly unfearful Ramaphosa used the oral reply session to also pour cold water on suggestions that dubious activities surrounded his campaign, saying: “In its funding, there was no wrongdoing, no criminality and no abuse of public funds or resources.”

Speaking on other matters, the president lambasted those he said walked around speaking ill of the National Health Insurance to investors while government sought to find solutions.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.